Overview of the Incident

In a troubling turn of events, Cornell University police made a drug-related arrest at the Chi Phi fraternity house just 22 hours before a former student, referred to as Jane Doe, alleged that she was drugged and sexually assaulted at the same location.

Details of the Arrest

The arrest occurred on October 19, 2024, shortly after 1 a.m., with police responding to reports at the fraternity house. The specific individual arrested, as well as the substances involved, remain undisclosed in the police records, which do not link this incident to the later reported assault.

Lawsuit Filed by Alleged Victim

Following the incident, Jane Doe filed a lawsuit against Cornell University and seven Chi Phi fraternity members. The suit accuses them of sexual assault that allegedly transpired while she was under the influence of ketamine, alcohol, and marijuana.

In documents obtained by NBC News, a witness mentioned observing a fraternity member in possession of ketamine approximately two months prior, although the timeline and details remained unclear.

University and Law Enforcement Response

Cornell University’s administration has remained largely silent regarding the allegations. However, President Michael Kotlikoff described the allegations as “deeply disturbing” and expressed a need for the university to improve its response to such issues.

As part of the ongoing investigation, local law enforcement initially collected witness statements and anonymous tips. Despite this, Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten decided against pursuing charges, stating that Jane Doe’s initial statement did not sufficiently indicate criminal activity.

Appointment of Special Prosecutor

In the wake of mounting concerns, New York Governor Kathy Hochul appointed Attorney General Letitia James as a special prosecutor. This action aims to evaluate whether any criminal charges are warranted, raising critical questions regarding the initial handling of the case.

Hochul voiced her concerns on the lack of thorough investigation by the district attorney’s office, emphasizing the need for a full review of the case and adequate interviews with all involved parties.